Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 30:
Line 30: + + + + + +
two users on warning
:I added the origin of solar systems but people keep reverting. Annoyingly, they don't even give a reason. Provide one please. [[User:AcomaMagic|AcomaMagic]] 15:59, 25 August 2012 (EDT)
:I added the origin of solar systems but people keep reverting. Annoyingly, they don't even give a reason. Provide one please. [[User:AcomaMagic|AcomaMagic]] 15:59, 25 August 2012 (EDT)
::Conservapedia takes a [[Young Earth]] Creationist approach to the question of the origins of the physical universe. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 16:01, 25 August 2012 (EDT)
::Conservapedia takes a [[Young Earth]] Creationist approach to the question of the origins of the physical universe. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 16:01, 25 August 2012 (EDT)
No, it doesn't. It does, however, respect '''all''' viewpoints on issues where there is a controversy. So:
#Do not start a new section about this, as if you hadn't bothered to read what was already written, and
#Avoid making nonsensical comments about policy, and
#Do not say no reason was given for a revert, when one was given.
You are allowed to disagree about how to write an article, but you're not allowed to make up fictions. First, last, and only warning. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:06, 25 August 2012 (EDT)