Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + + + +
why you are blocked
:::So if I delete edits done by Aschlafly that clearly violate his own Conservapedia rules, that are (as Karajou puts it) personal in nature rather than encyclopedic and neutral and undermine Conservapedia's credibility, you as Aschlafly's zealous servant will still revert my action? Peculiar behavior... What you should do of course is judge every single entry by its encyclopedic merits, regardless of who made the entry. [[User:Baobab|Baobab]] 02:57, 25 February 2012 (EST)
:::So if I delete edits done by Aschlafly that clearly violate his own Conservapedia rules, that are (as Karajou puts it) personal in nature rather than encyclopedic and neutral and undermine Conservapedia's credibility, you as Aschlafly's zealous servant will still revert my action? Peculiar behavior... What you should do of course is judge every single entry by its encyclopedic merits, regardless of who made the entry. [[User:Baobab|Baobab]] 02:57, 25 February 2012 (EST)
::::My apologies if I was being rude to you. If you are having insights on this page, feel free to discuss. It's more productive than the SNL thing (and more important) I suppose :). Good day, --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 11:17, 27 March 2012 (EDT)
::::My apologies if I was being rude to you. If you are having insights on this page, feel free to discuss. It's more productive than the SNL thing (and more important) I suppose :). Good day, --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 11:17, 27 March 2012 (EDT)
==Blocked==
Pretending you didn't know we have a hierarchy of editors is disingenuous, at best. Promoting open rebellion against the rules is intolerable. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:00, 27 August 2012 (EDT)