Changes

RobS seems to assume I am some sort of leftist, so let me just state for the record that I was born and raised and still consider myself a conservative American Catholic. I'm disappointed that I need to say that.  I hoped making intelligent, helpful, respectful contributions, factual and with references, would suffice. Unfortunately this site is not living up to my initial expectations, and the biggest contributions I've made on this site (ie a lot of work on the political spectrum page) got reverted completely by Ed... I understand Teresita was pretty upset about losing her contributions too.  

RobS seems to assume I am some sort of leftist, so let me just state for the record that I was born and raised and still consider myself a conservative American Catholic. I'm disappointed that I need to say that.  I hoped making intelligent, helpful, respectful contributions, factual and with references, would suffice. Unfortunately this site is not living up to my initial expectations, and the biggest contributions I've made on this site (ie a lot of work on the political spectrum page) got reverted completely by Ed... I understand Teresita was pretty upset about losing her contributions too.  

It seems I shouldn't need to explain why an encyclopedia page about the political spectrum should define the political spectrum. But notice that there have been hot debates here again and again about whether the Nazis etc etc are leftist or rightist.  The page as it currently stands ONLY says who is CALLED leftist or rightist.  It makes no attempt to explain why.  Therefore any debate about where some group falls on the spectrum is just NAME CALLING, and nothing more.  What we need is A DEFINITION (or some definitions) so that PF Fox and RobS can say "well Osama is a ---- because definition 1 says ----" or "no, Osama is a ---- because definition 2 ---- implies -----".  They would probably still detest each other, but at least they would be having a real debate instead of just engaging in name calling.

:Congratulations. We a glad you feel good about yourself, too.

One point RobS seems upset about is that he seems to think the political spectrum is supposed to classify every single political position. I don't think any political scientist uses it that way. SOME political positions can be classified on the left-right axis, not all.  I added a preamble to the list of definitions to try to clarify that.

It seems I shouldn't need to explain why an encyclopedia page about the political spectrum should define the political spectrum. But notice that there have been hot debates here again and again about whether the Nazis etc etc are leftist or rightist.  The page as it currently stands ONLY says who is CALLED leftist or rightist.

I have inserted the word 'theory', in the hope that it might help convince RobS. Personally I think it's silly to call the left-right spectrum a 'theory': it's just a definition used to classify something, like 'crunchy' versus 'mushy'. If I say a bowl of cereal is mushy, it seems silly to call that a 'theory'... I'm just classifying according to a definition. But if 'theory' makes Rob happier, I guess there is no harm in that.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have inserted the word 'theory', in the hope that it might help convince RobS. Personally I think it's silly to call the left-right spectrum a 'theory':  

 

 

it's just a definition  

 

 

 

used to classify something, like 'crunchy' versus 'mushy'. If I say a bowl of cereal is mushy, it seems silly to call that a 'theory'... I'm just classifying according to a definition. But if 'theory' makes Rob happier, I guess there is no harm in that.

Another thing that bothers RobS is that he seems to think calling somebody 'right' is slander.  I don't understand that.  According to the main definition I proposed, 'right' means standing up for traditional institutions and values, which sounds extremely respectable to me.   

Another thing that bothers RobS is that he seems to think calling somebody 'right' is slander.  I don't understand that.  According to the main definition I proposed, 'right' means standing up for traditional institutions and values, which sounds extremely respectable to me.   

In particular, in Europe the words left and right are used without any sense of insult at all.  I know, because several years ago my company sent me to live and work in Spain, and I speak Spanish, and read the local papers, and know many people here.  Obviously, if you start calling somebody 'extreme right' or 'extreme left', you are looking for a fight.  But if you just call them left or right, that's just like calling them liberal or conservative in the US.  In fact, lots of people respectfully say left/right in the US too, it's just a little less common.  

In particular, in Europe the words left and right are used without any sense of insult at all.  I know, because several years ago my company sent me to live and work in Spain, and I speak Spanish, and read the local papers, and know many people here.  Obviously, if you start calling somebody 'extreme right' or 'extreme left', you are looking for a fight.  But if you just call them left or right, that's just like calling them liberal or conservative in the US.  In fact, lots of people respectfully say left/right in the US too, it's just a little less common.  

That's one of the things that disappoints me about Conservapedia. There are lots of contributors running around calling each other names, but many pages completely lack definitions.  We need to DEFINE the words we use, so that we can have more civil and intelligent debates.---[[User:Redblue|Redblue ]]

That's one of the things that disappoints me about Conservapedia. There are lots of contributors running around calling each other names, but many pages completely lack definitions.  We need to DEFINE the words we use, so that we can have more civil and intelligent debates.---[[User:Redblue|Redblue ]]

:*Please don't think me rude in saying this, but poor Ed Poor is but one Sysop, although a highly valuable one! His "powers" are exactly the same as all of us who are Sysop's.  Now, his abilities of persuasion, and communication, are in many cases, greater than the rest of us!  ;-) ---  Please don't be too impatient, as many things have been happening lately.  The need for decision here is not on the "back burner", and is on our minds. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] ^{[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]} 08:02, 11 April 2007 (EDT)

:*Please don't think me rude in saying this, but poor Ed Poor is but one Sysop, although a highly valuable one! His "powers" are exactly the same as all of us who are Sysop's.  Now, his abilities of persuasion, and communication, are in many cases, greater than the rest of us!  ;-) ---  Please don't be too impatient, as many things have been happening lately.  The need for decision here is not on the "back burner", and is on our minds. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] ^{[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]} 08:02, 11 April 2007 (EDT)

:I have replied to you at length, because you are a valuable contributor and this is but the '''easiest''' of a whole slew of '''really tough''' issues we are going to face. We need to stick together and help each other. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:16, 11 April 2007 (EDT)

:I have replied to you at length, because you are a valuable contributor and this is but the '''easiest''' of a whole slew of '''really tough''' issues we are going to face. We need to stick together and help each other. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:16, 11 April 2007 (EDT)