Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,697
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
a start, please improve
A '''design patent''' gives legal protection to the ''design'' of a product, in contrast with a "[[utility patent]]," which protects a useful innovation.
The value of design patents was shown in a spectacular manner by a billion-dollar verdict in favor of [[Apple Computer]] against its rival [[Samsung]], based on three design patents owned by Apple (as well as three utility patents). [[Steve Jobs]], contrary to conventional wisdom, was a big believer in obtaining and trying to enforce design patents. This verdict has not yet been tested on appeal.
== Background ==
Although the ability to apply for design patents has existed since the 1800s, this type of patent was disfavored in the 1900s in favor of other forms of [[intellectual property]], such as [[trade dress]]. But in 2008 a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the [[Federal Circuit]], which set the precedent for patent law nationwide, increased the strength of design patents by weakening the testmaking the test whether an average person would mistake a rival product for a product that has a patented design.<ref>[http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/uploadedFiles/Reuters_Content/2011/12_-_December/EgyptianGoddess.pdf Egyptian Goddess decision]</ref> If that easy test is satisfied, and the design patent is valid and its holder may try to enforce it.
== References ==
<references/>
[[Category:intellectual property]]
The value of design patents was shown in a spectacular manner by a billion-dollar verdict in favor of [[Apple Computer]] against its rival [[Samsung]], based on three design patents owned by Apple (as well as three utility patents). [[Steve Jobs]], contrary to conventional wisdom, was a big believer in obtaining and trying to enforce design patents. This verdict has not yet been tested on appeal.
== Background ==
Although the ability to apply for design patents has existed since the 1800s, this type of patent was disfavored in the 1900s in favor of other forms of [[intellectual property]], such as [[trade dress]]. But in 2008 a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the [[Federal Circuit]], which set the precedent for patent law nationwide, increased the strength of design patents by weakening the testmaking the test whether an average person would mistake a rival product for a product that has a patented design.<ref>[http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/uploadedFiles/Reuters_Content/2011/12_-_December/EgyptianGoddess.pdf Egyptian Goddess decision]</ref> If that easy test is satisfied, and the design patent is valid and its holder may try to enforce it.
== References ==
<references/>
[[Category:intellectual property]]