Changes

I propose rewriting the section as follows - proposed changes are bolded:

I propose rewriting the section as follows - proposed changes are bolded:

<blockquote>The 90/10 rule, unique to Conservapedia, authorizes the blocking of accounts that engage in excessive article talk page,[2] bickering, last wordism, and other unproductive activity. Specifically, '''as stated in the Conservapedia:Commandments since soon after the formation of Conservapedia''':

{{cquote|The 90/10 rule, unique to Conservapedia, authorizes the blocking of accounts that engage in excessive article talk page,[2] bickering, last wordism, and other unproductive activity. Specifically, '''as stated in the Conservapedia:Commandments since soon after the formation of Conservapedia''':

"Unproductive activity, such as 90% talk page edits and only 10% quality edits to Conservapedia articles, may result in blocking of the account '''after 50 total edits to articles and talk pages (excluding debate pages)'''."

"Unproductive activity, such as 90% talk page edits and only 10% quality edits to Conservapedia articles, may result in blocking of the account '''after 50 total edits to articles and talk pages (excluding debate pages)'''."

'''Discussion of liberal viewpoints should occur on debate topics, not on articles and their talk pages. Users who edit articles and their talk pages should be productive by the 50 edit mark (excluding debate topics, which exist to allow disagreement from opposing views).'''  

'''Discussion of liberal viewpoints should occur on debate topics, not on articles and their talk pages. Users who edit articles and their talk pages should be productive by the 50 edit mark (excluding debate topics, which exist to allow disagreement from opposing views).'''  

The 90/10 Rule is remarkably adept at discouraging and eliminating the mobocracy or talk pollution that runs rampant on other sites, such as Wikipedia. Implementation is simple and application is swift. </blockquote>

The 90/10 Rule is remarkably adept at discouraging and eliminating the mobocracy or talk pollution that runs rampant on other sites, such as Wikipedia. Implementation is simple and application is swift.}}

I also propose a new section for "Point of View" as follows, with any other key issues added as necessary:

I also propose a new section for "Point of View" as follows, with any other key issues added as necessary:

<blockquote>Conservapedia operates from a conservative point of view, specifically a Young Earth Creationist, pro-heterosexual marriage, Pro-Life point of view. Articles and article talk pages should therefore avoid support for Evolution, homosexuality, and abortion, given the site's purpose. Those who wish to discuss contrasting views should do so in the debate section.</blockquote>

{{cquote|Conservapedia operates from a conservative point of view, specifically a Young Earth Creationist, pro-heterosexual marriage, Pro-Life point of view. Articles and article talk pages should therefore avoid support for Evolution, homosexuality, and abortion, given the site's purpose. Those who wish to discuss contrasting views should do so in the debate section.}}

--[[User:JZambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] 08:32, 4 September 2012 (EDT)

--[[User:JZambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] 08:32, 4 September 2012 (EDT)