SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,134
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 161:
Line 161: + +
Conservapedia talk:Guidelines (view source)
Revision as of 21:51, September 4, 2012
, 21:51, September 4, 2012→Proposed Rewrite of 90/10 Rule
:::::::He knew full well. Liberals have often bickered about lack of "tolerance" of evolutionary POV and about Barack Hussein Obama's middle name being used in the article title. He knew and was intentionally trolling. If you do not realize this, I will not try to explain this point further. Look at the name of the site: Conservapedia. If evolution is what he wants, evolution is what he will get on [[Wikipedia]]. He can go there to spout those talking points he calls "science". He wouldn't have reverted me or Senior Sysop User:Ed Poor if he didn't know he was in the wrong. "Assume good faith" stuff is malarkey on Wikipedia; editors are recognized by their contributions in making this a trustworthy encyclopedia. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 17:44, 4 September 2012 (EDT)
:::::::He knew full well. Liberals have often bickered about lack of "tolerance" of evolutionary POV and about Barack Hussein Obama's middle name being used in the article title. He knew and was intentionally trolling. If you do not realize this, I will not try to explain this point further. Look at the name of the site: Conservapedia. If evolution is what he wants, evolution is what he will get on [[Wikipedia]]. He can go there to spout those talking points he calls "science". He wouldn't have reverted me or Senior Sysop User:Ed Poor if he didn't know he was in the wrong. "Assume good faith" stuff is malarkey on Wikipedia; editors are recognized by their contributions in making this a trustworthy encyclopedia. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 17:44, 4 September 2012 (EDT)
::::::::Which only indicates he has some liberal views, not that he was intentionally trolling. It doesn't show all his views are liberal or that he supports Obama (it's possible for an Obama opponent to dislike the middle name because they think it makes the article look unprofessional). That he made a productive edit and was trying to talk things through suggests he was interested in making the site better, and not intentionally trolling. I don't think there's evidence to conclude he was intentionally trolling. He only made one revert that I can see, of your revert of him on the Solar System page.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Solar_System&diff=prev&oldid=1001818] I don't know that that's enough to conclude he knew he was in the wrong. --[[User:JZambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] 17:51, 4 September 2012 (EDT)