| Line 62: |
Line 62: |
| | We had to remove the reference to "700 years in France" as I am not sure what this is , and it is not in the text anyway. The use of "likely" , "very likely" and my additional fudge word "unusual" are all carefully chosen where used. [Keith Briffa, 2004] | | We had to remove the reference to "700 years in France" as I am not sure what this is , and it is not in the text anyway. The use of "likely" , "very likely" and my additional fudge word "unusual" are all carefully chosen where used. [Keith Briffa, 2004] |
| | | | |
| − | Either the scale needs adjusting, or we need to fudge the figures... [Elaine Barrow, UEA, 2005] | + | Either the scale needs adjusting, or we need to fudge the figures... [Elaine Barrow, UEA, 2005][[http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2011/11/climategate-emails-oh-fudge.html]]}} |
| − | | |
| − | ;****** APPLIES A VERY ARTIFICIAL CORRECTION FOR DECLINE*********
| |
| − | ;
| |
| − | yrloc=[1400,findgen(19)*5.+1904]
| |
| − | valadj=[0.,0.,0.,0.,0.,-0.1,-0.25,-0.3,0.,-0.1,0.3,0.8,1.2,1.7,2.5,2.6,2.6,$
| |
| − | 2.6,2.6,2.6]*0.75 ; fudge factor
| |
| − | if n_elements(yrloc) ne n_elements(valadj) then message,'Ooops!' [Keith Briffa, 1998][[http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2011/11/climategate-emails-oh-fudge.html]]}}
| |
| | | | |
| | ==Global Warming Methodology== | | ==Global Warming Methodology== |