Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 52: Line 52:     
[Met Office/Hadley's Simon Tett]  
 
[Met Office/Hadley's Simon Tett]  
'''1) Didn't see a justification for use of tree-rings and not using ice cores -- the obvious one is that ice cores are no good -- see Jones et al, 1998.
+
'''1) Didn't see a justification for use of tree-rings and not using ice cores -- the obvious one is that ice cores are no good -- see Jones et al, 1998. 2) No justification for regional reconstructions rather than what Mann et al did (I don't think we can say we didn't do Mann et al because we think it is crap!)'''[http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2011/11/climategate-scientists-on-michael-mann.html]}}
2) No justification for regional reconstructions rather than what Mann et al did (I don't think we can say we didn't do Mann et al because we think it is crap!)'''[http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2011/11/climategate-scientists-on-michael-mann.html]}}
   
{{cquote|Solution 1: fudge the issue. Just accept that we are Fast-trackers and can therefore get away with anything. [Mike Hulme]
 
{{cquote|Solution 1: fudge the issue. Just accept that we are Fast-trackers and can therefore get away with anything. [Mike Hulme]
   Line 65: Line 64:     
Either the scale needs adjusting, or '''we need to fudge the figures'''... [Elaine Barrow, UEA, 2005][[http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2011/11/climategate-emails-oh-fudge.html]]}}
 
Either the scale needs adjusting, or '''we need to fudge the figures'''... [Elaine Barrow, UEA, 2005][[http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2011/11/climategate-emails-oh-fudge.html]]}}
 +
 
==Coral Dating==
 
==Coral Dating==
 
{{cquote|cc: Malcolm Hughes
 
{{cquote|cc: Malcolm Hughes
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,126

edits

Navigation menu