71
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 205:
Line 205: − +
Talk:Theory of relativity (view source)
Revision as of 20:57, April 11, 2007
, 20:57, April 11, 2007→Why was quote about Dicke removed?
::::::: Also the article you misuse by taking the whole renaissance statement out of says this in the same paragraph before your quote!
::::::: Also the article you misuse by taking the whole renaissance statement out of says this in the same paragraph before your quote!
::::::::''Initially a popular alternative to General Relativity, the Brans-Dicke theory lost favor as it became clear that omega must be very large-an artificial requirement in some views. Nevertheless, the theory has remained a paradigm for the introduction of scalar fields into gravitational theory, and as such has enjoyed a renaissance in connection with theories of higher dimensional space-time.''
::::::::''Initially a popular alternative to General Relativity, the Brans-Dicke theory lost favor as it became clear that omega must be very large-an artificial requirement in some views. Nevertheless, the theory has remained a paradigm for the introduction of scalar fields into gravitational theory, and as such has enjoyed a renaissance in connection with theories of higher dimensional space-time.''
[[User:Teji|Teji]] 16:57, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::: [[User:Teji|Teji]] 16:57, 11 April 2007 (EDT)