SkipCaptcha
790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: +
Talk:Presidential debates 2012 (view source)
Revision as of 18:53, September 13, 2012
, 18:53, September 13, 2012no edit summary
:This is CONSERVAPEDIA not the New York Times. If you think Barack Hussein Obama winning this upcoming election isn't a bad thing you are so far gone that speaking with you is pointless. 13:55, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
:This is CONSERVAPEDIA not the New York Times. If you think Barack Hussein Obama winning this upcoming election isn't a bad thing you are so far gone that speaking with you is pointless. 13:55, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
::That's not what i think at all, don't put words in my mouth. But many conservatives, including this website, see Romney as a RINO. Conservatives who are not thrilled about Romney may well not see his election as "good" in its own right. Analyzing in terms of advantages and disadvantages is far more professional, and doesn't assume that a RINO is "good." [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 14:47, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
::That's not what i think at all, don't put words in my mouth. But many conservatives, including this website, see Romney as a RINO. Conservatives who are not thrilled about Romney may well not see his election as "good" in its own right. Analyzing in terms of advantages and disadvantages is far more professional, and doesn't assume that a RINO is "good." [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 14:47, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
Also, a moderator's dietary choices are irrelevant, and calling someone an "affirmative action recipient" without evidence looks petty. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 14:53, 13 September 2012 (EDT)