Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
32 bytes removed ,  04:10, September 24, 2012
no edit summary
Line 60: Line 60:  
==== Extinction ====
 
==== Extinction ====
   −
Creation "science" rejects the great impact Theory, pointing out multiple problems with this. <ref>Jonathan Sarfati, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2426 Did a meteor wipe out the dinosaurs?].</ref> Despite this "evidence", the great impact theory is widely considered by the scientific community to be fact. Granted, they can't prove this definitively, however it's a much more likely scenario than a bearded man in the sky controlling everything with his magic wand.
+
Creation "science" rejects the great impact Theory, pointing out multiple problems with this. <ref>Jonathan Sarfati, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2426 Did a meteor wipe out the dinosaurs?].</ref> Despite this "evidence", the great impact theory is widely considered by the scientific community to be fact. Granted, they can't prove this definitively, however it is considered to be a more likely scenario than competing explanations.
    
Creation "science" shows that evolutionists are frequently coming out with a "New Theory of Dinosaur Extinction" and that their theories are laden with false assumptions <ref>Michael Matthews, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/1115dinosaur.asp Dinosaur demise theory, version #451], ''Answers in Genesis''</ref>.
 
Creation "science" shows that evolutionists are frequently coming out with a "New Theory of Dinosaur Extinction" and that their theories are laden with false assumptions <ref>Michael Matthews, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/1115dinosaur.asp Dinosaur demise theory, version #451], ''Answers in Genesis''</ref>.
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
432

edits

Navigation menu