362
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: +
User talk:TonySidaway (view source)
Revision as of 20:14, September 25, 2012
, 20:14, September 25, 2012→How about you stop inserting liberal claptrap into articles
: My edits are consistent with the best scientific knowledge we have at present. Bearing in mind that the light reaching our telescopes from the Andromeda galaxy was emitted by stars over two million years ago, what conceivable reason could you have for asserting that the earth cannot be old? --[[User:TonySidaway|TonySidaway]] 07:54, 25 September 2012 (EDT)
: My edits are consistent with the best scientific knowledge we have at present. Bearing in mind that the light reaching our telescopes from the Andromeda galaxy was emitted by stars over two million years ago, what conceivable reason could you have for asserting that the earth cannot be old? --[[User:TonySidaway|TonySidaway]] 07:54, 25 September 2012 (EDT)
::Conservapedia affirms that the world is six thousand years old. Get over it, and edit something else if necessary. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 11:36, 25 September 2012 (EDT)
::Conservapedia affirms that the world is six thousand years old. Get over it, and edit something else if necessary. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 11:36, 25 September 2012 (EDT)
:: Read the article again. It contains some reasonably accurate information buried in the nonsense which I removed. --[[User:TonySidaway|TonySidaway]]