Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 50:
Line 50: + +
Talk:John 15-21 (Translated) (view source)
Revision as of 18:13, September 27, 2012
, 18:13, September 27, 2012→Validity of Chapter 21: @Aschlafly: editorializing
:Michael, your contributions to the project are truly appreciated, but walls of text do not add to discussions. I'm simply unsure if you're making a point or ranting. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 17:18, 17 March 2010 (EDT)
:Michael, your contributions to the project are truly appreciated, but walls of text do not add to discussions. I'm simply unsure if you're making a point or ranting. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 17:18, 17 March 2010 (EDT)
::I never rant, I'm just long winded, and have an almost irresistible desire to be as thorough as possible. If I express an opinion, I try to give the full reason for that opinion. The short little two sentence, "this is my opinion" and "this is my counter opinion" does me no good and I find no value in it. Most of the time I don't even bother to read them. On the other hand, opinions supported by facts, logical reasoning, and evidence are very powerful, and I alway read those. I personally want to know facts, or at the very least, reasons, so that is what I provide. I only participate in discussions that I have researched, so I provide most of my findings, and the reasons for my positions up front. Possibly this is not the forum for that kind of thing. If not, just let me know and I will stop doing it. --[[User:MBack|Michael Back]] 17:53, 18 March 2010 (EDT)
::I never rant, I'm just long winded, and have an almost irresistible desire to be as thorough as possible. If I express an opinion, I try to give the full reason for that opinion. The short little two sentence, "this is my opinion" and "this is my counter opinion" does me no good and I find no value in it. Most of the time I don't even bother to read them. On the other hand, opinions supported by facts, logical reasoning, and evidence are very powerful, and I alway read those. I personally want to know facts, or at the very least, reasons, so that is what I provide. I only participate in discussions that I have researched, so I provide most of my findings, and the reasons for my positions up front. Possibly this is not the forum for that kind of thing. If not, just let me know and I will stop doing it. --[[User:MBack|Michael Back]] 17:53, 18 March 2010 (EDT)
I didn't want to editorialize and I'm happy with the current version. I just wanted to make the '''three year old phrase''' '' However, no ancient manuscript of John that actually ends at 20:31, so, if John 21 is an addition, the addition occurred immediately after the original text was finished'' into a sentence. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:13, 27 September 2012 (EDT)