Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
567 bytes added ,  03:07, October 6, 2012
no edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:     
The series does however seems to make certain elements of conservatism "cool" to young school girls whereas other series targeting the demographic encourage immorality (the pro-Satanic elements notwithstanding). Despite not referencing Christianity, the series seems to support traditional marriage and Chrisitian morals; for example, Edward, being from the 19th century when immorality seen as normal in modern times was considered taboo, refused to engage in sexual intercourse with Bella prior to marriage, and Bella was pro-life even when having the baby put herself at great risk (this in particular upsets [[liberal]]s).  
 
The series does however seems to make certain elements of conservatism "cool" to young school girls whereas other series targeting the demographic encourage immorality (the pro-Satanic elements notwithstanding). Despite not referencing Christianity, the series seems to support traditional marriage and Chrisitian morals; for example, Edward, being from the 19th century when immorality seen as normal in modern times was considered taboo, refused to engage in sexual intercourse with Bella prior to marriage, and Bella was pro-life even when having the baby put herself at great risk (this in particular upsets [[liberal]]s).  
 +
 +
==Relationship Dynamics==
 +
 +
The relationship between Edward and Bella, while exhibiting many conservative characteristics on the surface, has many subtle and not-so-subtle hints of psychological abuse. One major example is Edward physically removing the engine from Bella's truck, and a popularly-cited example on anti-''Twilight'' forums is Edward watching Bella while she sleeps.
 +
 +
It goes without saying that any person exhibiting such behavior is to be ''kept away from,'' rather than being pursued romantically, regardless of how honourable their surface intent.
    
==References==
 
==References==
62

edits

Navigation menu