| − | According to ''K.Jousten et al.'', there is no doubt that there are macroscopic areas between [[galaxy|galaxies]] where there is no single [[molecule]]. For such volume a contemporary physics introduced a term ''absolute vacuum''. However, even such absolute vacuum is expected not to be void in terms of [[energy]] if it should be in accordance with [[Natural Law|natural laws]]. The energy of vacuum with still ''unknown nature'' is believed to be possibly related to [[cosmological constant]] introduced by [[Einstein]] and permitting particles to be generated spontaneously by fluctuating [[Quantum field theory|quantum fields]] for short time intervals, even in ''absolute vacuum''. From this perspective, there is supposed to be no place in the world that is truly empty.<ref name="Handbook on vacuum"/> According to 2011 Nobel Laureate in Physics, Brian P. Schmidt, it is a big mystery why space should have energy at all, ''"people around the world are scratching their heads to figure out but as of today there has not been lot progress yet"''.<ref>{{cite web | + | According to ''K.Jousten et al.'', there is no doubt that there are macroscopic areas between [[galaxy|galaxies]] where there is no single [[molecule]]. For such volume contemporary physics introduced a term ''absolute vacuum''. However, even such absolute vacuum is expected not to be void in terms of [[energy]] if it should be in accordance with [[Natural Law|natural laws]]. The energy of vacuum with still ''unknown nature'' is believed to be possibly related to [[cosmological constant]] introduced by [[Einstein]] and permitting particles to be generated spontaneously by fluctuating [[Quantum field theory|quantum fields]] for short time intervals, even in ''absolute vacuum''. From this perspective, there is supposed to be no place in the world that is truly empty.<ref name="Handbook on vacuum"/> According to 2011 Nobel Laureate in Physics, Brian P. Schmidt, it is a big mystery why space should have energy at all, ''"people around the world are scratching their heads to figure out but as of today there has not been lot progress yet"''.<ref>{{cite web |
| | |accessdate=4.10.2012}}</ref> [[YEC]] creationist physicist [[John Hartnett|J.Hartnett]] however declares that in the new theory introduced by [[Moshe Carmeli|M.Carmeli]] the physics of the cosmos including the energy of the vacuum is defined by correct choice of [[metric]] that is a solution to Einstein's field equations.<ref name="starlight">{{cite book| last = Hartnett| first = John| authorlink = | title = Starlight, Time and the New Physics| publisher = Creation Ministries International| series = | year = 2007| doi = | isbn = 978-0-949-906687|pages=132|quote=In the CGR theory this is the energy of the vacuum, the stuff the space is made of. The physics of the cosmos is defined by correct choice of the metric that is a solution of Einstein's field equations.}}</ref> | | |accessdate=4.10.2012}}</ref> [[YEC]] creationist physicist [[John Hartnett|J.Hartnett]] however declares that in the new theory introduced by [[Moshe Carmeli|M.Carmeli]] the physics of the cosmos including the energy of the vacuum is defined by correct choice of [[metric]] that is a solution to Einstein's field equations.<ref name="starlight">{{cite book| last = Hartnett| first = John| authorlink = | title = Starlight, Time and the New Physics| publisher = Creation Ministries International| series = | year = 2007| doi = | isbn = 978-0-949-906687|pages=132|quote=In the CGR theory this is the energy of the vacuum, the stuff the space is made of. The physics of the cosmos is defined by correct choice of the metric that is a solution of Einstein's field equations.}}</ref> |