Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
RfA Σ
Line 15: Line 15:  
#Wikipedia smears [[conservative]] groups with prominent "Criticism and controversy" sections,<ref>See, e.g., http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Family_Association#Criticism_and_controversy</ref> usually featuring name-calling by obscure groups, but Wikipedia flatters [[liberal]] groups by downplaying what it euphemistically entitles as "Controversial stances."<ref>See, e.g., http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACLU#Controversial_stances</ref>
 
#Wikipedia smears [[conservative]] groups with prominent "Criticism and controversy" sections,<ref>See, e.g., http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Family_Association#Criticism_and_controversy</ref> usually featuring name-calling by obscure groups, but Wikipedia flatters [[liberal]] groups by downplaying what it euphemistically entitles as "Controversial stances."<ref>See, e.g., http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACLU#Controversial_stances</ref>
 
#Wikipedia does not allow the statement [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andrew_Schlafly&diff=prev&oldid=504750935 "Conservapedia has become a widely-edited source of criticism of Wikipedia."]
 
#Wikipedia does not allow the statement [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andrew_Schlafly&diff=prev&oldid=504750935 "Conservapedia has become a widely-edited source of criticism of Wikipedia."]
 +
# In 2011 Wikipedia User Σ organized systematic vandalism of Conservapedia using the English Wikipedia IRC.  This only came to light when he was nominated to be a Wikipedia Administrator and users there debated whether his actions were a good or bad thing to do.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/%CE%A3&oldid=516746349</ref>
 +
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{Bias in wikipedia}}
 
{{Bias in wikipedia}}
 
[[Category:Wikipedia]]
 
[[Category:Wikipedia]]
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,592

edits

Navigation menu