Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Reverted edits by Nightsky (talk) to last revision by Karajou
Line 540: Line 540:  
::::::Meh, they were accused of being Pro-Bush, especially during the WMD intelligence controversy. If a news organisation can break a story as big as this would be, they'll take it. At the moment there's no evidence that it's fake and it's a fringe theory even among Republicans and it's a non-issue. [[User:Nightsky|Nightsky]] 19:15, 8 October 2012 (EDT)
 
::::::Meh, they were accused of being Pro-Bush, especially during the WMD intelligence controversy. If a news organisation can break a story as big as this would be, they'll take it. At the moment there's no evidence that it's fake and it's a fringe theory even among Republicans and it's a non-issue. [[User:Nightsky|Nightsky]] 19:15, 8 October 2012 (EDT)
 
:::::::They did break the story; if it's not your favorite news organization I don't know what to tell you. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 19:35, 8 October 2012 (EDT)
 
:::::::They did break the story; if it's not your favorite news organization I don't know what to tell you. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 19:35, 8 October 2012 (EDT)
::::::::They broke a story that a few conservatives alleged that it is fake and that there is very little support for that view. [[User:Nightsky|Nightsky]] 12:35, 9 October 2012 (EDT)
 
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336

edits

Navigation menu