Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 547: Line 547:  
Sorry if this has been discussed before, but wouldn't it be better for consistancy with the other presidential pic to have the image at the top of the article to be the official US presidential portrait. --[[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 08:29, 14 October 2012 (EDT)
 
Sorry if this has been discussed before, but wouldn't it be better for consistancy with the other presidential pic to have the image at the top of the article to be the official US presidential portrait. --[[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 08:29, 14 October 2012 (EDT)
   −
:Definitaly.  The current photo is of fairly low quality, and isn't focused on the face.  I can see why it was chosen, I just think that those reasons betray stupidity and parochialism and are not really worthy of consideration. [[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 04:30, 17 October 2012 (EDT)
+
:Definitely.  The current photo is of fairly low quality, and isn't focused on the face.  I can see why it was chosen, I just think that those reasons betray stupidity and parochialism and are not really worthy of consideration. [[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 04:30, 17 October 2012 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
432

edits

Navigation menu