29
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 188:
Line 188: + +
Talk:Disputed Biblical Translations (view source)
Revision as of 05:42, October 19, 2012
, 05:42, October 19, 2012→Original Greek: idea (almost 3 years later)
:::::::: Fine, but what are you waiting for? All you've been doing is talking. This is a wiki. Substantive edits are the name of this game. I look forward to seeing you do some.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:07, 30 October 2009 (EDT)
:::::::: Fine, but what are you waiting for? All you've been doing is talking. This is a wiki. Substantive edits are the name of this game. I look forward to seeing you do some.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:07, 30 October 2009 (EDT)
:::::::: Which greek texts are you going to rely on then? Even Nestle is a conglomerate. Any why not include while we are at it the Coptic? --[[User:StephenDeloney|StephenDeloney]] 02:09, 9 December 2009 (EST)
:::::::: Which greek texts are you going to rely on then? Even Nestle is a conglomerate. Any why not include while we are at it the Coptic? --[[User:StephenDeloney|StephenDeloney]] 02:09, 9 December 2009 (EST)
Perhaps we could use Strong's. I actually did so before coming across this discussion. --[[User:Nouniquenames|Nouniquenames]] 01:42, 19 October 2012 (EDT)
==With Child vs Pregnant==
==With Child vs Pregnant==
It seems an incredible leap to suggest that using "pregnant" in the translation as an alternative to "with child" is down to perjorative language. To me "With Child" is simply a more archaic expression for terms more likely to be used today such as expecting or pregnant unless one happened to be having a decidely poetic day. The view of pregnancy that may be expoused by those who support aborion differs from my own view of a child existing, but that to me is their error of their view of what being pregnant means. The word itself is not a problem in the context of the translation. [[User:DavidMilton|DavidMilton]] 21:14, 28 August 2011 (EDT)
It seems an incredible leap to suggest that using "pregnant" in the translation as an alternative to "with child" is down to perjorative language. To me "With Child" is simply a more archaic expression for terms more likely to be used today such as expecting or pregnant unless one happened to be having a decidely poetic day. The view of pregnancy that may be expoused by those who support aborion differs from my own view of a child existing, but that to me is their error of their view of what being pregnant means. The word itself is not a problem in the context of the translation. [[User:DavidMilton|DavidMilton]] 21:14, 28 August 2011 (EDT)