1,631
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 146:
Line 146: + + +
Debate:Is the theory of macroevolution true? (view source)
Revision as of 04:56, January 15, 2007
, 04:56, January 15, 2007no edit summary
:::: Evolutionists generally deny that there is intrinsic beauty in nature. Over 99% of Americans think there is beauty in nature. Take your pick. Count me as part of the over 99% majority.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:47, 14 January 2007 (EST)
:::: Evolutionists generally deny that there is intrinsic beauty in nature. Over 99% of Americans think there is beauty in nature. Take your pick. Count me as part of the over 99% majority.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:47, 14 January 2007 (EST)
'''Reply:''' I personally believe that God purposefully created nature for humans to enjoy and care for and that he purposefully made it beautiful as a blessing for us. nevertheless, from an evolutionary standpoint, beauty can still be explained; if we all came from a common ancestor, especially given our reliance on nature for suvival, I don't see why the theory of evolution cannot be reconciled with the fact that 99% of Americans find beauty in autumn foliage.
: 8. Abiogenesis is impossible. Even the simplest life form possible would be way too complicated to spring from nothing.
: 8. Abiogenesis is impossible. Even the simplest life form possible would be way too complicated to spring from nothing.