Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:     
I think that religion is just a tool to make people feel safe and not alone in this world. However, many religious doctrines have been proven wrong by modern science. In the case of Christianity, science has disproved the biblical teaching that the world is flat.  Science has shown us that the world cannot be 6,000 years old as the bible teaches through methods such as carbon dating with fossils. So now that we know how most of the world works there is no need for it anymore. I mean the world isnt flat right and we know the world isnt 6000 years old. So basically in this day in age we dont need an ancient book to tell us how the world works. i would like to think of myself as more intelligant then people who were alive 2000 years ago.  All major religions (with the exception of buddhism which does not worship a higher being) were created to outline specific mores and give simple comprehendable explanations for things as complex as the creation of the universe.  In today's world, religion can really only serve one of those two purposes effectively, that is to provide moral codes and societal rules. An ever increasing amount of "history" provided in the Bible has been proven to be false, and it seems unlikely that the entire universe was created by a being living in the third dimension and shaped like a human being (it also seems like an egocentrical thing to believe but that's beside the point).  So religion's only real significant purpose today is to set up moral code.  However, this is not to say that laws should be based on such moral codes.  The moralities set up in each religion are different.  Mores are not universally accepted or shared.  Furthermore, many rules set up in the bible cause the infringement upon the rights of others (i.e. banning of gay marriage, bans on abortion etc.).  If religion serves a purpose today than it is a considerably smaller one than it did a thousand years ago. {{unsigned|Rhompa}}
 
I think that religion is just a tool to make people feel safe and not alone in this world. However, many religious doctrines have been proven wrong by modern science. In the case of Christianity, science has disproved the biblical teaching that the world is flat.  Science has shown us that the world cannot be 6,000 years old as the bible teaches through methods such as carbon dating with fossils. So now that we know how most of the world works there is no need for it anymore. I mean the world isnt flat right and we know the world isnt 6000 years old. So basically in this day in age we dont need an ancient book to tell us how the world works. i would like to think of myself as more intelligant then people who were alive 2000 years ago.  All major religions (with the exception of buddhism which does not worship a higher being) were created to outline specific mores and give simple comprehendable explanations for things as complex as the creation of the universe.  In today's world, religion can really only serve one of those two purposes effectively, that is to provide moral codes and societal rules. An ever increasing amount of "history" provided in the Bible has been proven to be false, and it seems unlikely that the entire universe was created by a being living in the third dimension and shaped like a human being (it also seems like an egocentrical thing to believe but that's beside the point).  So religion's only real significant purpose today is to set up moral code.  However, this is not to say that laws should be based on such moral codes.  The moralities set up in each religion are different.  Mores are not universally accepted or shared.  Furthermore, many rules set up in the bible cause the infringement upon the rights of others (i.e. banning of gay marriage, bans on abortion etc.).  If religion serves a purpose today than it is a considerably smaller one than it did a thousand years ago. {{unsigned|Rhompa}}
−
  −
= Why Ask? ==
  −
  −
This seems to be a pointless question.  Which religion are you refering to?  Do you mean one in particular or just religiosity in general?  If you say yes or no how far are you willing to go to bring about that outcome?
  −
  −
  −
17:57, 24 May 2007 (EDT)17:57, 24 May 2007 (EDT)[[User:Evanave|Evanave]] 17:57, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
  −
  −
"Christianity should play a large role in modern society, as God intended, for it is the Truth." Right...because we know that this so called God said that Christianity was right and was the truth...Hey, why don't we all live like our savior Jesus...oh wait, Jesus was Jewish...If you want to follow his path, convert! Jesus was Jewish, get over it, this is a fact (as opposed to the existence of a god).
  −
  −
Also, I have trouble taking arguments seriously when I read:
  −
  −
"i would like to think of myself as more intelligant then people who were alive 2000 years ago." I'll let you slide on the I, but come on people...it is intelligent than, not intelligant then.
  −
  −
"destroyed by force if nessicessary - both for its constantly earthly attrocities and oppressions," nessicessary? attrocities? Try something like...necessary or atrocities.
  −
  −
Moving on...
  −
  −
There is no proof whatsoever of the existence of a supreme being. Not one single bit of information. There are approximately 6 billion people in this world, and if I'm not mistaken, over 80% of people are religious...That means 4-5 billion people waste their time praying to nothing (Assuming all of these people have prayed at some point or another)
  −
  −
What makes you believe in God? Somebody told you that God existed as a little child and you believed them. People also used to think that cigarettes weren't harmful to the body, but guess what, people were wrong!
  −
  −
Take a moment and think...what has God done for me? How would my life be different if I did not believe in God?
  −
  −
I have no answer, but then again, I'm atheist.
  −
  −
So, in response to the question, No, religion should not play ANY role in modern societies.
  −
  −
~Evan
  −
:Lack of evidence does not speak ''against'' the truth/existence of anything, anybody with a basic knowledge of science should know that. And religion gives you a crutch, regardless of whether it is true or not; ''knowing'' (truly believing, knowing that you are undoubtedly correct) that there is a God who loves you can be the best drug ever. And don't take the politicized Christian Conservative views as the ''only'' kind of Christianity; There are plenty of forms which are much more Biblically accurate than evangelism (IMHO). --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 17:58, 24 May 2007 (EDT) 
  −
==Humanist==
  −
Exactly what the Humanist Manifesto says is being repeated here. Waisting your time praying to nothing... etc. You are a Humanist. That is a religion. You say you are an atheist? You are a Humanist. You are religious. Non-theistic religion. You obviously don't even now what constitutes a religion. When someone says religion, you think of Judeo-Christianity. Whatever your religious belief is, and whether it is theistic or non-theistic, get over it. It's all religion, and every single one of you believe in something. So instead of criticizing everybody elses why don't you all get a life and tell us all what is so great about what you, that's right you, believe in. If all you got is bashing everyone else then it only tells the rest of us you ain't got nothin.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 22:14, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
  −
  −
That isn't true. I believe reality exists. The truth is out there and then it whops us on the head. Damn truth.
  −
I was under the impression that religion had to do with belief in God(s). Morality and ethical codes are not religion because they are based on reality (it's the other people stupid).
  −
(We) bash you because it reminds (us) of wack a mole. It is rather fun, although it can be tedious. - Sam
  −
  −
==Maybe not==
  −
Not that it's not relevant, its just, it shouldn't play a large role. Relgion is like your thoughts, its yours, you make it according to your own personal moral values and based on the teachings of those before you. Getting religions entangled with people is quite dangerous some times, or annoying at others. Religion is for you and those who believe with you and those who wish to believe, none others.
 
25

edits

Navigation menu