SkipCaptcha
48
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 53:
Line 53: +
→Recent coverage: Forbes article
=Recent coverage=
=Recent coverage=
*[http://www.popsci.com/category/tags/november-2012 Popular Science, November 2012]. "Can Andrea Rossi's Infinite-Energy Black Box Power The World--Or Just Scam It?" ''The Rossi claims have not been independently confirmed, and publicly-available evidence is inadequate to determine if the devices work at all, and if they do, if they depend on cold fusion, or low-energy nuclear reactions, or not. There is minor coverage in this article of other, scientifically-established, approaches to cold fusion. ''
*[http://www.popsci.com/category/tags/november-2012 Popular Science, November 2012]. "Can Andrea Rossi's Infinite-Energy Black Box Power The World--Or Just Scam It?" ''The Rossi claims have not been independently confirmed, and publicly-available evidence is inadequate to determine if the devices work at all, and if they do, if they depend on cold fusion, or low-energy nuclear reactions, or not. There is minor coverage in this article of other, scientifically-established, approaches to cold fusion. ''
*[http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2012/10/20/cold-fusion-gets-a-little-more-real/ Forbes, October 2012] "Cold Fusion Gets a Little More Real." ''Author Mark Gibbs doesn't clearly distinguish between scientific reality (established) and practical reality (not established).
= References =
= References =