Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,148
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 115:
Line 115: + + + + +
Conservapedia proven right (view source)
Revision as of 12:15, October 26, 2012
, 12:15, October 26, 2012no edit summary
|The new version [[Feminist Bible|distorts and conceals numerous references]] to the unborn child in the Bible, apparently to appease the pro-abortion position.
|The new version [[Feminist Bible|distorts and conceals numerous references]] to the unborn child in the Bible, apparently to appease the pro-abortion position.
|Nov. 1, 2010<ref>http://thechurchofjesuschrist.us/2010/10/new-niv-text-to-be-made-available-online-november-1/ (announcing availability of online version)</ref>
|Nov. 1, 2010<ref>http://thechurchofjesuschrist.us/2010/10/new-niv-text-to-be-made-available-online-november-1/ (announcing availability of online version)</ref>
|-
|August 2010
|In August of 2010, Conservapedia created the article [[Women's views of Richard Dawkins]] indicating that Richard Dawkins had a problem with the women segment of the marketplace and that he [[Abrasiveness of Richard Dawkins|was abrasive]] and [[Atheism and cowardice|cowardly.]]
|Atheist men scoff at the article.
|In July of 2011, the [[Elevatorgate]] scandal occurs. A women of the [[Skepchick]] community says "I look forward to watching your legacy crash and burn".
|-
|-
|Oct. 14, 2010
|Oct. 14, 2010