Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
The question is based on the reality that "Obama will almost certainly win [at least] 237 electoral votes," as discussed in the lecture. But I'll add that to the question so there is no misunderstandi
Line 20: Line 20:     
I'm not sure whether this was meant to be a trick question (in which case this post will probably spoil the answer), but wouldn't the correct answer to the question as written be "none of them", because Romney can win with any 46 states?  If that's not the intended correct answer, perhaps it might be good to reword the question.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 21:07, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
 
I'm not sure whether this was meant to be a trick question (in which case this post will probably spoil the answer), but wouldn't the correct answer to the question as written be "none of them", because Romney can win with any 46 states?  If that's not the intended correct answer, perhaps it might be good to reword the question.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 21:07, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
:The question is based on the reality that "Obama will almost certainly win [at least] 237 electoral votes," as discussed in the lecture. But I'll add that to the question so there is no misunderstanding.  Thanks for mentioning this.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:55, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,891

edits

Navigation menu