Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
194 bytes added ,  14:15, October 27, 2012
→‎Voter intimidation: Studies show that overall turnout is not increased by early voting. If anything, it detracts from the respect of Election Day.
Line 2: Line 2:     
The page says that early voting "facilitates voter intimidation, particularly by unions and large employers that try to increase turnout by their people."  Could someone please explain this?  As I understand it, the ballot is still secret, and voters are free to spoil their ballot without anyone knowing.  I personally think that increased ''lawful'' participation in democracy makes our government better.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 12:04, 13 October 2012 (EDT)
 
The page says that early voting "facilitates voter intimidation, particularly by unions and large employers that try to increase turnout by their people."  Could someone please explain this?  As I understand it, the ballot is still secret, and voters are free to spoil their ballot without anyone knowing.  I personally think that increased ''lawful'' participation in democracy makes our government better.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 12:04, 13 October 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Studies show that overall turnout is not increased by early voting.  If anything, it detracts from the respect of Election Day.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:15, 27 October 2012 (EDT)
 +
 
==Need sources==
 
==Need sources==
 
An encyclopedia article needs to be more than personal opinion and should have sources.  The sentence, "The less the early voting, the more integrity there is in the process, and the more likely it is the Republican candidate will win.:" is not necessarily true and is certainly not true over a long period of time.  But there is no caveat as to what time period is address.  The only text reference is to the year 2010.  I can think of states where early voting was disproportionately for the Republican candidate. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 10:01, 27 October 2012 (EDT)
 
An encyclopedia article needs to be more than personal opinion and should have sources.  The sentence, "The less the early voting, the more integrity there is in the process, and the more likely it is the Republican candidate will win.:" is not necessarily true and is certainly not true over a long period of time.  But there is no caveat as to what time period is address.  The only text reference is to the year 2010.  I can think of states where early voting was disproportionately for the Republican candidate. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 10:01, 27 October 2012 (EDT)
    
:I'll look for cites, but the truth of the statement is self-evident.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:14, 27 October 2012 (EDT)
 
:I'll look for cites, but the truth of the statement is self-evident.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:14, 27 October 2012 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,370

edits

Navigation menu