Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:     
:But this rebuttal is circular, assuming what it attempts to prove.
 
:But this rebuttal is circular, assuming what it attempts to prove.
 +
::No, it just stresses the point how surprising this idea of Jesus's authorship is.
    
*Traditionally we expect  God's word to be carved in stone, not scribbled on parchment...
 
*Traditionally we expect  God's word to be carved in stone, not scribbled on parchment...
    
:But humor is no substitute for logical argument ...
 
:But humor is no substitute for logical argument ...
 +
::Humor comes into place when there isn't any logical argument in the first place: your ''reasons'' are at best circumstantial, and the question "what did Jesus do during the forty days" is amusing - perhaps he had 39 days of a writer's block, and then started scribbling?
    
*In light of the rejection of Jesus by some Hebrew leaders, it makes sense that Jesus would write a post-Resurrection letter to the Hebrew people '''''not''''' anonymously, as this would persuade them more easily.
 
*In light of the rejection of Jesus by some Hebrew leaders, it makes sense that Jesus would write a post-Resurrection letter to the Hebrew people '''''not''''' anonymously, as this would persuade them more easily.
    
:No, it's clear that people who rejected Jesus when He was alive would not be persuaded by something attributed to him after the [[Passion for Christ]].
 
:No, it's clear that people who rejected Jesus when He was alive would not be persuaded by something attributed to him after the [[Passion for Christ]].
−
 
+
::So, why writing then at all?
    
(add to list)
 
(add to list)
 
[[Category:Mystery]]
 
[[Category:Mystery]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023

edits

Navigation menu