Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:E=mc² (view source)

Revision as of 01:34, November 13, 2012

1 byte removed ,  01:34, November 13, 2012
m
→‎Still waiting for an answer....: typo
Line 613: Line 613:  
:It's widely recognized that E=mc2 has not been experimentally verified.  There has been no Nobel Prize awarded for it, for example, and there is no logical basis for even deriving the equation.
 
:It's widely recognized that E=mc2 has not been experimentally verified.  There has been no Nobel Prize awarded for it, for example, and there is no logical basis for even deriving the equation.
   −
:But a broken clock is correct twice a day.  Would someone claims that proves the clock is working??--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:21, 12 November 2012 (EST)
+
:But a broken clock is correct twice a day.  Would someone claim that proves the clock is working??--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:21, 12 November 2012 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,936

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1018294"

Navigation menu