Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,135
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 42:
Line 42: + + + +
→re: claim that early voting undermines voter ID: new section
:Yes, you're right. Oregon and Washington are 100% early voting ... and as result it is virtually impossible for a Republican to win there. Please add your good suggested edits to the content page.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:22, 13 November 2012 (EST)
:Yes, you're right. Oregon and Washington are 100% early voting ... and as result it is virtually impossible for a Republican to win there. Please add your good suggested edits to the content page.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:22, 13 November 2012 (EST)
== re: claim that early voting undermines voter ID ==
I reverted [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Early_voting&diff=1018436&oldid=1018367 this edit] because it does not have a solid factual basis. First of all, some of the early voting states listed in the article do not even have voter ID laws in effect (Nevada, Wisconsin, Iowa, North Carolina). Second of all, some strict photo ID states like Georgia have no-excuse absentee balloting as a failsafe to prevent disenfranchisement of voters who may otherwise like photo ID. ''See'' ''Common Cause/Georgia v. Billups'', 504 F.Supp.2d 1333, 1379 (2007). Finally, the edit ignores laws of states like Illinois, which require early voters (such as Obama this election) to present ID, but not Election Day voters. [[User:GregG|GregG]] 20:32, 13 November 2012 (EST)