Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 60:
Line 60: + + + + +
Towards a standard
: Guidelines would be fine, we do want to keep the rules and regulations to a minimum here, in contrast with Wikipedia. Sysops have discretion and authority, and we do ban obscenity. Generally unintellectual comments are disfavored. A comment like "Piss-poor" wouldn't be tolerated in a good university homework assignment, so why should we?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:02, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
: Guidelines would be fine, we do want to keep the rules and regulations to a minimum here, in contrast with Wikipedia. Sysops have discretion and authority, and we do ban obscenity. Generally unintellectual comments are disfavored. A comment like "Piss-poor" wouldn't be tolerated in a good university homework assignment, so why should we?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:02, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
::I smell a [[Conservapedia:Standard]] emerging:
::*unintellectual comments are disfavored
::*good university homework assignment
::I'd translate this into a guideline as, "Avoid unintellectual article comments and strive to make articles of a quality which is on par with a good university homework assignment." I'll settle for a good high school homework assignment, especially when starting an article (see [[stub]]). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 05:52, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
== Namespace Filters for Contrib Pages ==
== Namespace Filters for Contrib Pages ==