SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,592
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: +
Talk:Free Enterprise (view source)
Revision as of 13:57, November 17, 2012
, 13:57, November 17, 2012article needs to be expanded and refined
:Like other anti-competitive behavior, unions that demand mandatory membership as a condition of employment at unionized companies -- as occurs in Democrat-controlled states -- are an interference with free enterprise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 07:41, 17 November 2012 (EST)
:Like other anti-competitive behavior, unions that demand mandatory membership as a condition of employment at unionized companies -- as occurs in Democrat-controlled states -- are an interference with free enterprise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 07:41, 17 November 2012 (EST)
::[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Free_Enterprise&action=historysubmit&diff=1018964&oldid=780175 This edit] not only adds the claim that unions are contrary to free enterprise, but it also puts a different spin on the role of government regulation (or even voluntary self-regulation.) There is a large body of economic scholarship on the question of regulation and when it is needed. The article can introduce the concept of markets, market failure, and when regulation is or is not appropriate. The current text strongly implies that government regulation is always bad and is always a drag on the economy. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 08:57, 17 November 2012 (EST)