6
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 159:
Line 159: + + + + + + + +
Talk:Richard Dawkins (view source)
Revision as of 01:53, November 21, 2012
, 01:53, November 21, 2012→Citations: new section
The table of contents should be after the first paragraph, not half way down the page ! [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 06:26, 25 October 2012 (EDT)
The table of contents should be after the first paragraph, not half way down the page ! [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 06:26, 25 October 2012 (EDT)
::Move up higher. Plus, reinserted some previous material. 06:40, 25 October 2012 (EDT)
::Move up higher. Plus, reinserted some previous material. 06:40, 25 October 2012 (EDT)
== Citations ==
I noticed [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Richard_Dawkins&curid=103255&diff=1019763&oldid=1019761 this recent edit].
Is it appropriate for an editor (1) to cite a blog in an article? and (2) if so, is it still ok if it is ''his own'' blog?
It seems to me that allowing such citations is an invitation to editors to just go and create their own sources that say whatever they want. Such dishonest behaviour is not very conducive to the production of trustworthy articles. --[[User:ReginaldF|ReginaldF]] 20:53, 20 November 2012 (EST)