93
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + + +
Talk:Epistle to the Hebrews (view source)
Revision as of 20:26, November 22, 2012
, 20:26, November 22, 2012no edit summary
Aschlafly, your "theory" doesn't hold any water. Read e.g., Hebrews 4:14 : "Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession." Is this something Jesus would have written? There are many more examples showing that the author ("we") is different from the Son of God! Read the text! Your "theory" is based on ignorance. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:36, 22 November 2012 (EST)
Aschlafly, your "theory" doesn't hold any water. Read e.g., Hebrews 4:14 : "Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession." Is this something Jesus would have written? There are many more examples showing that the author ("we") is different from the Son of God! Read the text! Your "theory" is based on ignorance. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:36, 22 November 2012 (EST)
:At the end of the day, the claim is referenced sufficiently to the standards required here at Conservapedia. It should be left in for that reason. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 15:20, 22 November 2012 (EST)
:At the end of the day, the claim is referenced sufficiently to the standards required here at Conservapedia. It should be left in for that reason. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 15:20, 22 November 2012 (EST)
===Just a thought===
''If'' Jesus wrote this epistle, then surely it must be regarded as the most significant book of the NT, and surely he must have intended it to be regarded as such. What logical reason is there for him to allow Christianity to develop a Gospel fixation, as it were, and not to have made it ''abundantly clear'' that this epistle is his final message to mankind? --[[User:JohanZ|JohanZ]] 15:26, 22 November 2012 (EST)