Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:  
''If'' Jesus wrote this epistle, then surely it must be regarded as the most significant book of the NT, and surely he must have intended it to be regarded as such. What logical reason is there for him to allow Christianity to develop a Gospel fixation, as it were, and not to have made it ''abundantly clear'' that this epistle is his final message to mankind? --[[User:JohanZ|JohanZ]] 15:26, 22 November 2012 (EST)
 
''If'' Jesus wrote this epistle, then surely it must be regarded as the most significant book of the NT, and surely he must have intended it to be regarded as such. What logical reason is there for him to allow Christianity to develop a Gospel fixation, as it were, and not to have made it ''abundantly clear'' that this epistle is his final message to mankind? --[[User:JohanZ|JohanZ]] 15:26, 22 November 2012 (EST)
 
:As I understand it, it is regarded as being abundantly clear that Jesus wrote it.  Have you not read [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]  I'll admit to not being as strong a biblical scholar as Andy is (I can't speak Greek for one thing) but it cannot be said that it has not been made abundantly clear to him.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 15:35, 22 November 2012 (EST)
 
:As I understand it, it is regarded as being abundantly clear that Jesus wrote it.  Have you not read [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]  I'll admit to not being as strong a biblical scholar as Andy is (I can't speak Greek for one thing) but it cannot be said that it has not been made abundantly clear to him.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 15:35, 22 November 2012 (EST)
 +
::Indeed. I'm still struggling with the idea of Christianity proceeding from such a fundamental misreading of its own scripture. --[[User:JohanZ|JohanZ]] 15:43, 22 November 2012 (EST)
93

edits

Navigation menu