Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 56:
Line 56: + + +
→Epistle to the Hebrews
::::I am also a longstanding editor DamianJohn that has no play here. [[User talk:Aschlafly|This is Andy's talk page if you wish to complain further]]. I suggest you not participate in block warring. Blocking a user because you disagree with his block is not a thing.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 16:23, 22 November 2012 (EST)
::::I am also a longstanding editor DamianJohn that has no play here. [[User talk:Aschlafly|This is Andy's talk page if you wish to complain further]]. I suggest you not participate in block warring. Blocking a user because you disagree with his block is not a thing.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 16:23, 22 November 2012 (EST)
:::::You have behaved inappropriately, and that needs to be said. And you need to understand that. Who are you to say that AugustO was edit warring? You were also just reverting his edits. He was at least attempting to be constructive whilst you were just blocking any attempt to improve the article. There are ways of dealing with these things that do not involve deliberately picking fights with editors. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 16:30, 22 November 2012 (EST)
:::::You have behaved inappropriately, and that needs to be said. And you need to understand that. Who are you to say that AugustO was edit warring? You were also just reverting his edits. He was at least attempting to be constructive whilst you were just blocking any attempt to improve the article. There are ways of dealing with these things that do not involve deliberately picking fights with editors. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 16:30, 22 November 2012 (EST)
''AugustO waited for Andy to leave (and thus no longer be there to revert him) even though he had already started a dialogue with ASchlafly.'' That is just slanderous - or libelous (I always mix these two terms): I reverted Aschlafly's edit at '''14:16h''' and commented about this at '''14:18h''' on the talk-page. At '''14:22h''' Aschlafly reverted my comment (without addressing my points at the talk-page) and I did so with his at '''14:23h''', clearly waiting for a whole minute for Aschlafly to leave! Twenty minutes later you appeared to "settle down a little". And while Aschlafly reverted my edit because he thinks he has a point, you did so without understanding the subject. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:34, 22 November 2012 (EST)