90
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 80:
Line 80: + + + +
no edit summary
::Articles on the Bible have to be edited with the utmost care: It's certainly the most serious topic which Conservapedia is addressing. My contributions to the CBP are all about keeping up the integrity of the project. And yes, even when the founder of this site makes edits to such subjects, I will scrutinize them: for me, this meritocracy is not about the merits of the editors, but the merit of the edits. And the current "insights" on the authorship of the Epistle to the Hebrews are detrimental to the quality of this wiki. It isn't exactly vandalism as the editor has not the intention to make bad edits, but the result is the same.
::Articles on the Bible have to be edited with the utmost care: It's certainly the most serious topic which Conservapedia is addressing. My contributions to the CBP are all about keeping up the integrity of the project. And yes, even when the founder of this site makes edits to such subjects, I will scrutinize them: for me, this meritocracy is not about the merits of the editors, but the merit of the edits. And the current "insights" on the authorship of the Epistle to the Hebrews are detrimental to the quality of this wiki. It isn't exactly vandalism as the editor has not the intention to make bad edits, but the result is the same.
::--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 17:13, 22 November 2012 (EST)
::--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 17:13, 22 November 2012 (EST)
==NPOV==
Sorry about that. Is a neutral tone preferable though? Otherwise the page becomes an amalgamation of the different opinions of different editors. And is NPOV different from refraining from posting opinions, as stated in the commandments?