Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
56 bytes added ,  22:04, November 27, 2012
Line 19: Line 19:  
Greetings! I just wanted to clarify, I mean no disrespect. I am not denying the 6000 year creation. It's just that not all conservatives accept this model. And there may be another reason why the distant stars are visible; the in situ model is just one of many possibilities.
 
Greetings! I just wanted to clarify, I mean no disrespect. I am not denying the 6000 year creation. It's just that not all conservatives accept this model. And there may be another reason why the distant stars are visible; the in situ model is just one of many possibilities.
   −
~Katie
+
[[User:KatieKomori|KatieKomori]] 17:04, 27 November 2012 (EST)
    
:I see what you mean, but at Conservapedia it is a generally accepted idea that the earth is 6000 years old. I would discuss this further on it's talk page before continuing; some other Conservatives may have something to say about this. And btw: you can sign your talk posts with four tildes (~). [[User:JJCC|JJCC]] 16:58, 27 November 2012 (EST)
 
:I see what you mean, but at Conservapedia it is a generally accepted idea that the earth is 6000 years old. I would discuss this further on it's talk page before continuing; some other Conservatives may have something to say about this. And btw: you can sign your talk posts with four tildes (~). [[User:JJCC|JJCC]] 16:58, 27 November 2012 (EST)
90

edits

Navigation menu