439
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 495:
Line 495: + + + +
Talk:Essay:Best New Conservative Words (view source)
Revision as of 04:41, November 29, 2012
, 04:41, November 29, 2012→"pertinence" not a high enough standard?: new section
Not sure whether to add this one. I know there's been discussions about zero with respect to biblical scientific foreknowledge ... should it be included? [[User:WilcoxD|WilcoxD]] 23:27, 28 November 2012 (EST)
Not sure whether to add this one. I know there's been discussions about zero with respect to biblical scientific foreknowledge ... should it be included? [[User:WilcoxD|WilcoxD]] 23:27, 28 November 2012 (EST)
PS. Sorry for all the edits - just getting into this list ;)
PS. Sorry for all the edits - just getting into this list ;)
== "pertinence" not a high enough standard? ==
Andy, could you please explain the characteristics which distinguish "addictive", "aerobics", "ambulance chaser", "axiomatic" and so on and so forth as less run-of-the-mill and of a higher standard than the word "pertinence"? In my opinion "pertinence" is a very '''good''' word, alluding to logic and insight - both of which appear as conservative values in the Conservatism template. Perhaps I can be a more constructive contributer if this is clear [[User:WilcoxD|WilcoxD]] 23:41, 28 November 2012 (EST)