Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
JudyJ no longer has time for this. I don't either, but it has to be done.
Line 202: Line 202:  
#:
 
#:
 
#:The effect of Relativity on this is, of course, the precession of the "perihelion" due to the effects of General Relativity.  From the information that has been gathered, the precession should be about 1.14 arcseconds per Earth century, or about 1/37<sup>th</sup> that of Mercury.  The precession of Mercury was established with accurate visual observations.  Measuring something 1/37<sup>th</sup> as large, from the Doppler shift in spectroscopic measurements, is utterly beyond current technology.  Other than that, there is no reason to consider relativity.  Classical mechanics will do just fine.
 
#:The effect of Relativity on this is, of course, the precession of the "perihelion" due to the effects of General Relativity.  From the information that has been gathered, the precession should be about 1.14 arcseconds per Earth century, or about 1/37<sup>th</sup> that of Mercury.  The precession of Mercury was established with accurate visual observations.  Measuring something 1/37<sup>th</sup> as large, from the Doppler shift in spectroscopic measurements, is utterly beyond current technology.  Other than that, there is no reason to consider relativity.  Classical mechanics will do just fine.
 +
#''General Relativity fails to predict the Allais Effect.''
 +
#:A quick Google search will show that there is no "concerted effort to suppress knowledge about the phenomenon".  Tom van Flandern (no darling of those who accept relativity; he has been cited at Conservapedia in the "Lack of evidence for Relativity" section) explains the phenomenon in his 2003 paper [http://prd.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v67/i2/e022002 Allais gravity and pendulum effects during solar eclipses explained]: "Here we show that an unusual phenomenon that occurs only during solar eclipses, rapid air mass movement for the bulk of the atmosphere above normal cloud levels, appears to be a sufficient explanation for both the magnitude and behavior of the anomaly previously reported in these pages."
 +
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266

edits

Navigation menu