4,994
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 40:
Line 40: + + + + + + + +
Propose edit to protected article
::Was the article created because someone genuinely thought we needed an article on German pastry, or was it a "coatrack article" whose only purpose was to bring in the Kennedy story? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:56, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
::Was the article created because someone genuinely thought we needed an article on German pastry, or was it a "coatrack article" whose only purpose was to bring in the Kennedy story? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:56, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
== Propose edit to protected article ==
The sentence "It may be considered a doughnut, although it lacks a hole" should be removed, since the ''definition'' of a doughnut is:
:"A small ring-shaped cake made of rich, light dough that is fried in deep fat." [http://www.bartleby.com/61/2/D0360200.html AHD]
:"a small usually ring-shaped cake fried in fat" [http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/doughnut]
It may be ''considered'' a donut, I suppose, but there is nothing to stop me from ''considering'' it to be a Sachertorte, a bagel, or a smoked kipper. Who "considers" it a donut? It reminds me of the old saw about "how many legs would a dog have if you call the tail a leg?" Answer: four, because calling the tail a leg doesn't make it one. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 10:03, 12 April 2007 (EDT)