Changes

::::I can't believe that I've got the burden of proof on this =/ but whatevs, I'll see what I can find. [[User:KatieKomori|KatieKomori]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)

::::I can't believe that I've got the burden of proof on this =/ but whatevs, I'll see what I can find. [[User:KatieKomori|KatieKomori]] 23:16, 2 December 2012 (EST)

:::::I am interested to read what you find.  I should also note that I also am not always entirely enamoured by the POV of this site, although I always try to stick to articles that are POV free and I try to toe the line on issues that are controversial.  There is no point in getting worked up about this, it's just the nature of POV wikis.  Where an issue is likely to be controversial, I suggest you tread with the utmost care.  My short block and mild rebuke of you was partially an attempt to ensure you weren't dealt with more severely by other editors, who may have just blocked you permanently for edit warring with Andy.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:36, 3 December 2012 (EST)

:::::I am interested to read what you find.  I should also note that I also am not always entirely enamoured by the POV of this site, although I always try to stick to articles that are POV free and I try to toe the line on issues that are controversial.  There is no point in getting worked up about this, it's just the nature of POV wikis.  Where an issue is likely to be controversial, I suggest you tread with the utmost care.  My short block and mild rebuke of you was partially an attempt to ensure you weren't dealt with more severely by other editors, who may have just blocked you permanently for edit warring with Andy.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:36, 3 December 2012 (EST)

:::::So how exactly does this POV thing work? I'm just trying to understand. Do some things that align with that POV not need citation as much as things that are at odds with the POV? I figured that the POV meant that it would just focus on findings that support it, but I thought they still needed citation. I guess I'm just trying to figure out how this whole POV thing works in terms of citation. [[User:KatieKomori|KatieKomori]] 10:19, 3 December 2012 (EST)

::::::So how exactly does this POV thing work? I'm just trying to understand. Do some things that align with that POV not need citation as much as things that are at odds with the POV? I figured that the POV meant that it would just focus on findings that support it, but I thought they still needed citation. I guess I'm just trying to figure out how this whole POV thing works in terms of citation. [[User:KatieKomori|KatieKomori]] 10:19, 3 December 2012 (EST)

:::::::That's pretty much it.  I dunno if its quite as brazen as that, but essentially things that conform to the POV require less stringent citations than those that do not.  That's true in general by the way.  The maxim "''We demand strict proof for opinions we dislike, but are satisfied with mere hints for what we're inclined to accept''" is unfortunately extremely accurate.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:46, 4 December 2012 (EST)

==(Obvious trolling)==

==(Obvious trolling)==