Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 80:
Line 80: + + + + + + + + +
→Epistle to the Hebrews
::Articles on the Bible have to be edited with the utmost care: It's certainly the most serious topic which Conservapedia is addressing. My contributions to the CBP are all about keeping up the integrity of the project. And yes, even when the founder of this site makes edits to such subjects, I will scrutinize them: for me, this meritocracy is not about the merits of the editors, but the merit of the edits. And the current "insights" on the authorship of the Epistle to the Hebrews are detrimental to the quality of this wiki. It isn't exactly vandalism as the editor has not the intention to make bad edits, but the result is the same.
::Articles on the Bible have to be edited with the utmost care: It's certainly the most serious topic which Conservapedia is addressing. My contributions to the CBP are all about keeping up the integrity of the project. And yes, even when the founder of this site makes edits to such subjects, I will scrutinize them: for me, this meritocracy is not about the merits of the editors, but the merit of the edits. And the current "insights" on the authorship of the Epistle to the Hebrews are detrimental to the quality of this wiki. It isn't exactly vandalism as the editor has not the intention to make bad edits, but the result is the same.
::--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 17:13, 22 November 2012 (EST)
::--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 17:13, 22 November 2012 (EST)
===FYI===
Until Aschlafly answers to the points made a week ago at the talk-page, I remove the phrase "'', and one plausible theory is that Jesus himself wrote or dictated it''" from the introduction of [[Epistle to the Hebrews]]. However, I keep in the sentence ''"Andrew Schlafly, founder of [[Conservapedia]], proposes the possibility that Jesus Christ Himself was the author of this epistle (see [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]])''" from the section [[Epistle to the Hebrews#Author]].
It seems to be a flaw of the system that Andrew Schlafly's best way to keep this controversial point in the article is ''not'' to come to its defense, but to rely on the reverts made by others who don't judge the content.
I hope that this controversial topic is at first discussed on the talk-page ''before'' it is put back on prominent display.
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 05:48, 4 December 2012 (EST)
==NPOV==
==NPOV==