Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,947
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 77:
Line 77: − +
Cosmological constant (view source)
Revision as of 23:15, December 9, 2012
, 23:15, December 9, 2012→Revival of the cosmological constant vs. property of the correct metric: grammar
|acessdate=7.10.2012}}</ref>
|acessdate=7.10.2012}}</ref>
According to [[John Hartnett|J.Hartnett]], it would be fair to state that most cosmologist would like the requirement for cosmological constant to disappear altogether. He interprets its extremely small value as a possible evidence for fine-tuned universe.<ref name="DismantlingBB"/>
According to [[John Hartnett|J.Hartnett]], it would be fair to state that most cosmologists would like the requirement for cosmological constant to disappear altogether. He interprets its extremely small value as a possible evidence for fine-tuned universe.<ref name="DismantlingBB"/>
The 2011 Nobel Laureate in Physics, Brian P. Schmidt was asked in 2011 the question "what is causing the universe to expand at accelerating rate?" which he answered by words that it is a big mystery why space should have energy at all, people around the world are scratching their heads to figure out but as of today there has not been lot progress yet.<ref>{{cite web
The 2011 Nobel Laureate in Physics, Brian P. Schmidt was asked in 2011 the question "what is causing the universe to expand at accelerating rate?" which he answered by words that it is a big mystery why space should have energy at all, people around the world are scratching their heads to figure out but as of today there has not been lot progress yet.<ref>{{cite web
|title=Nobel Laureates 2011
|title=Nobel Laureates 2011