Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
278 bytes added ,  04:25, December 17, 2012
Reverted to remove remaining vandalism
Line 1: Line 1:  
''See also [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth]].''
 
''See also [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth]].''
   −
the '''Age of the erth''' has bin a madder of intrest to huminz for millianz uv yerez the subgect is still debated today, perticulluree between [[young Earth creationisum|young-Earth scientists]], who believe that the erth is only 6 thoosend yeres old, and most scientific orginizashunz who beleve that erth is around 45 billion yeres old.[http://www.interacademies.net/10878/13901.aspx]<ref>http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/22/opinion/polls/main965223.shtml</ref> The scientific evidence [[young earth creationism|points to a young age of the earth and the universe]], and the biblical creation organisashin [[Creation Ministries International]] published n artical calld ''[http://creation.com/age-of-the-earth 101 evidences for a young age of the earth and the universe]'', which further argues for the yung age of the erth.  
+
The '''Age of the Earth''' has been a matter of interest to humans for millennia. The subject is still debated today, particularly between [[young Earth Creationism|young-Earth scientists]], who believe that the Earth is only approximately 6,000-10,000 years old, and most scientific organisations who believe that Earth is approximately 4.5 billion years old.[http://www.interacademies.net/10878/13901.aspx]<ref>http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/22/opinion/polls/main965223.shtml</ref> The scientific evidence [[young earth creationism|points to a young age of the earth and the universe]], and the biblical creation organization [[Creation Ministries International]] published an article entitled ''[http://creation.com/age-of-the-earth 101 evidences for a young age of the earth and the universe]'', which further argues for the young age of the Earth.  
   −
Proponents of an old erth rely on the assumption that the [[Radiometric dating|rate of radioactive decay]], but the sientistz dont know tht god put the radiatun in the fosilz to trik the sientistz .<ref>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899536205000138#bib6</ref>  Even so, such an error will not cause a calculation of the age of the Earth based on radiometric dating to be off by up to five [[order of magnitude|orders of magnitude]].
+
Proponents of an Old Earth rely on the assumption that the [[Radiometric dating|rate of radioactive decay]] remains constant over thousands of years. In fact, a large number of physical processes, such as neutron capture and fluctuations in solar radiation, can affect the rate of radioactive decay of elements in the Earth's crust and render radioactive dating measurements unreliable with errors up to 5%, depending upon the specific methods used.<ref>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899536205000138#bib6</ref>  Even so, such an error will not cause a calculation of the age of the Earth based on radiometric dating to be off by up to five [[order of magnitude|orders of magnitude]].
    
== Historical views ==
 
== Historical views ==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
7,846

edits

Navigation menu