8
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 42:
Line 42: − + − (2) God does not want to or −
User:TheAmazingApatheist (view source)
Revision as of 16:55, December 21, 2012
, 16:55, December 21, 2012no edit summary
There is a test, based on the ontological evidence against god, that you can do to try the existence of god. Pray, and ask god to provide you with a clear proof for his existence within a week. After that week, if you have got a proof that god exists, send me the evidence. If not, there are only three reasons I can think of that are plausible:
There is a test, based on the ontological evidence against god, that you can do to try the existence of god. Pray, and ask god to provide you with a clear proof for his existence within a week. After that week, if you have got a proof that god exists, send me the evidence. If not, there are only three reasons I can think of that are plausible:
(1) God does not exist,
(1) God does not exist,(2) God does not want to or (3) God can't give you this evidence.
(3) God can't give you this evidence.
Because of the ontological evidence, alternative (2) and (3) are not worth your worship and thus they equal alternative (1). So if you get no response there is no god.
Because of the ontological evidence, alternative (2) and (3) are not worth your worship and thus they equal alternative (1). So if you get no response there is no god.