79
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 280:
Line 280: + +
Debate: 15 questions for evolutionists (view source)
Revision as of 14:54, December 28, 2012
, 14:54, December 28, 2012→Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ story-telling tolerated?
"Just so storytelling" is not a defined term, and is most likely a completely subjective snarl word used to denigrate any scientific theory the asker doesn't agree with. The question is vague in wording, disingenuous in its intent and pointoess to answer, because the asker has already decided that evolution is a fairy tale sight unseen.
"Just so storytelling" is not a defined term, and is most likely a completely subjective snarl word used to denigrate any scientific theory the asker doesn't agree with. The question is vague in wording, disingenuous in its intent and pointoess to answer, because the asker has already decided that evolution is a fairy tale sight unseen.
Natural selection would prefer men who are faithful protectors/providers since the offspring have a greater chance of success. [[User:RaymondZ|RaymondZ]] 09:54, 28 December 2012 (EST)
===What a creationist would reply===
===What a creationist would reply===