93
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 132:
Line 132: + +
→Quotation is irrelevant
:The wording is odd, and suggests that Obama is a Muslim but felt he could not say so publicly (yet). When combined with other compelling evidence, it is relevant. It would be admissible under basic rules of evidence.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:32, 3 January 2013 (EST)
:The wording is odd, and suggests that Obama is a Muslim but felt he could not say so publicly (yet). When combined with other compelling evidence, it is relevant. It would be admissible under basic rules of evidence.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:32, 3 January 2013 (EST)
::Frankly, I see no compelling evidence on the entire page. Perhaps, in a similar way as what you suggested above, you could identify your three strongest arguments that Obama '''is''' a Muslim, so that those could be discussed. Thanks, [[User:GregG|GregG]] 20:41, 3 January 2013 (EST)
::Frankly, I see no compelling evidence on the entire page. Perhaps, in a similar way as what you suggested above, you could identify your three strongest arguments that Obama '''is''' a Muslim, so that those could be discussed. Thanks, [[User:GregG|GregG]] 20:41, 3 January 2013 (EST)
:::I don't believe Mr Schlafly has a single strong argument that Obama is Muslim, let alone three. Unless I'm very much mistaken, he's working on the old "throw enough mud" approach. --[[User:JohanZ|JohanZ]] 20:52, 3 January 2013 (EST)