SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,592
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 152:
Line 152: + +
→Quotation is irrelevant: response
::::Your point is well-taken. But at this point I don't see why the observation that Obama is a Muslim would be considered so negative. He's not campaigning any more for an election. Understanding his personal beliefs -- about which he's said little -- is not a criticism of him.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:34, 3 January 2013 (EST)
::::Your point is well-taken. But at this point I don't see why the observation that Obama is a Muslim would be considered so negative. He's not campaigning any more for an election. Understanding his personal beliefs -- about which he's said little -- is not a criticism of him.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:34, 3 January 2013 (EST)
:::::As we say here: I'll wear that. :) 23:48, 3 January 2013 (EST)
:::::As we say here: I'll wear that. :) 23:48, 3 January 2013 (EST)
As to why the accuracy of this article matters, I will offer two hypothetical. Suppose in 2020, a Muslim runs for the Presidency. Some people will argue that electing a Muslim might not be wise, other people will respond that a precedent was already set with Obama's two elections. They will go to the Internet Archive (www.archive.org) and retrieve this article as evidence for a "fact" that over 90% of Americans do not believe. Second, suppose that some long-time volunteer (including the home-school students that you recruited) put their CP work on their resume. This article will cast a pall on all of the good work that has been done in this project. The problem with this article is that it draws a false conclusion using a series of non-facts that are presented in a highly misleading manner. The article also implies that President Obama is untruthful about his religious beliefs. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 08:35, 4 January 2013 (EST)