Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
726 bytes added ,  07:24, January 6, 2013
explain my edits as a polite geture to the other editor
Line 1: Line 1: −
 
+
On January 4, a number of edits were made that do not accurately reflect the background and context of the fiscal cliff.  It is improper synthesis to link the fiscal cliff (which was a coincidence of federal policies that in combination would create a recession because they were scheduled to take effect at the same time) with the "Cloward-Piven Strategy".  If an editor wants to add a separate section to the article about a "Cloward-Piven Strategy" theory it should be at the bottom of the article and not in the main section.  Also note, the sequestration applies to both security and non-defense domestic spending, but does '''not''' apply to any entitlements. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 02:24, 6 January 2013 (EST)
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,592

edits

Navigation menu