Changes

:In addition to the polling, the [[Obama's Religion|evidence is overwhelming]] that Obama is [[Muslim]].  Given how the [[liberal media]] censor any discussion of this issue. the polling data on it is even more remarkable.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:47, 4 January 2013 (EST)

:In addition to the polling, the [[Obama's Religion|evidence is overwhelming]] that Obama is [[Muslim]].  Given how the [[liberal media]] censor any discussion of this issue. the polling data on it is even more remarkable.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:47, 4 January 2013 (EST)

::Thank you for the feedback.  From an editorial viewpoint, I am trying to maintain flow.  Obama's quotation uses the phrase "rumors that have been over the Internet" and "score political points".  I think that he is referring to the 2007 email blasts that started this. (I personally believe that such an effort would have come from a prospective Democratic primary opponent rather than from a true conservative.) So the sentence following the quote should stick with "rumor" rather than inject "best efforts of Obama's supporters" without any predicate.  As for the polling, I believe the more polling references provided in the article, the better. I am pleased that the "one in four" language was changed.  However, the bottom line is that if we are going to "let the readers decide", we should drop phrases like "Starting in 2007, unidentified people revealed that he was most likely a Muslim."  I believe that the article can be written in a way that leaves CP without answering the question one way or the other.  This issue is not important to me, but as the public face of CP, Aschlafly could take a serious hit in his personal reputation if this page receives widespread media attention in its current form.  The folks that funded the 2007 email effort did not leave fingerprints, but it would be ironic if Aschlafly picked up the smoldering gun with his bear hands just in time to be identified as the proponent of the issue. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 03:19, 6 January 2013 (EST)

::Thank you for the feedback.  From an editorial viewpoint, I am trying to maintain flow.  Obama's quotation uses the phrase "rumors that have been over the Internet" and "score political points".  I think that he is referring to the 2007 email blasts that started this. (I personally believe that such an effort would have come from a prospective Democratic primary opponent rather than from a true conservative.) So the sentence following the quote should stick with "rumor" rather than inject "best efforts of Obama's supporters" without any predicate.  As for the polling, I believe the more polling references provided in the article, the better. I am pleased that the "one in four" language was changed.  However, the bottom line is that if we are going to "let the readers decide", we should drop phrases like "Starting in 2007, unidentified people revealed that he was most likely a Muslim."  I believe that the article can be written in a way that leaves CP without answering the question one way or the other.  This issue is not important to me, but as the public face of CP, Aschlafly could take a serious hit in his personal reputation if this page receives widespread media attention in its current form.  The folks that funded the 2007 email effort did not leave fingerprints, but it would be ironic if Aschlafly picked up the smoldering gun with his bare hands just in time to be identified as the proponent of the issue. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 03:19, 6 January 2013 (EST)

== User:Wschact ==

== User:Wschact ==