Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:E=mc² (view source)

Revision as of 20:52, January 8, 2013

348 bytes added ,  20:52, January 8, 2013
→‎Problematic edit: It's in the realm of science fiction at best, and not as good as other types of science fiction.
Line 642: Line 642:  
:Would something like that help clarify the true position?
 
:Would something like that help clarify the true position?
 
:[[User:Peterw|Peterw]] 15:47, 8 January 2013 (EST)
 
:[[User:Peterw|Peterw]] 15:47, 8 January 2013 (EST)
 +
 +
::No [[Nobel Prize]] has been given for this implausible formula, so no meaningful experimental verification of it has occurred.  There is utterly no logical explanation for the formula.  It's in the realm of science fiction at best, and not as good as other types of science fiction.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:52, 8 January 2013 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,500

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1028182"

Navigation menu